Ireland has no credible plan for net zero emissions by 2050. It makes sense to consider every option, including nuclear energy.

The Challenge

Most national zero emissions plans use either hydro or nuclear energy along with renewables. Ireland’s hydro is relatively limited, so we must consider nuclear; as well as batteries, hydrogen, interconnection, and carbon capture and storage.

The Evidence

Including nuclear makes it easier and cheaper to decarbonize electricity, according to:

  • The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
  • The International Energy Agency
  • The UN Economic Commission for Europe

These organizations recognize nuclear energy as a critical technology for achieving climate goals.

Our Research Findings

18% nuclear could eliminate fossil fuels from our electricity cheaper and faster than the Climate Action Plan that arbitrarily excludes nuclear.

Our independent research shows:

  • Faster decarbonization: Zero carbon electricity by 2040
  • Lower costs: Reduced overall system costs compared to renewables-only approach
  • Greater reliability: 24/7 baseload power regardless of weather
  • Energy security: Less dependence on imports and fossil fuels

Why 18%?

Our modeling indicates that adding 18% nuclear to Ireland’s planned 80% renewables by 2030 would:

  1. Deliver zero carbon emissions faster than the current plan
  2. Cost less than simply extending renewable capacity
  3. Ensure grid stability and reliability
  4. Replace fossil fuel backup power

This is compatible with existing and planned renewable energy infrastructure.

The Reality

Ireland has almost no chance of meeting our emissions limits under current plans. It appears reckless to continue without considering nuclear, the world’s safest and most-used clean energy option.

The science is clear: Nuclear energy should be part of Ireland’s climate solution.

Learn More